I'm looking for places to submit a new science fiction story. The first two were a given for me, they are the two places I always submit my best short science fiction work -- Asimov's and Fantasy & Science Fiction. My philosophy is that if I'm serious about my writing I always need to start at the top and work my way down the list of possible outlets based on reputation and payscale.
Here's where the pet peeve comes in. In researching the next outlet I came across writers guideline from a publication that says:
" Unless you are convinced that your work is of a top-shelf, global standard – the sort of excellent fiction published by, for example, Asimov’s – please don’t bother."
Wait, I'm confused, if you're an author convinced that your short story is good enough for Asimov's shouldn't that be where you send it? Why would you send it to this unknown publication instead?
Seriously people, it can't be that hard to write your guidelines that you have to resort to things like "Only take what should be published in 'World Renowned Publication XYZ'." I've actually seen this sort of wording before and it has become a BIG pet peeve of mine. I never send my work for consideration to any outlet that says stuff like this. I'm positive that lack of my short stories to reject has never harmed one of these outlets :-) but it makes me feel better to not support an outlet that resorts to lazy guidelines.